Lesson ▪ 2002 Tags: 2 Corinthians 8-9; Giving Related Resources: Missions Giving: Ministry through Generosity (2 Corinthians 8:1-9:15) ▪ Leadership Principles in 2 Corinthians Introductory IssuesThe Grace Giving Model—Normative?Much of these two chapters is historical and personal, not doctrinal. We should not assume a priori that every aspect of the Corinthian-Macedonian giving model is directly applicable to twenty-first century American Christians. In fact, Paul gave some indication of this when he stated, “I speak not by commandment, but by occasion of the forwardness of others, and to prove the sincerity of your love” (8:8). He later referred to his statements on the matter of giving as “advice” (gnome: judgment, opinion, resolve, advice, decree) (8:10). This fact notwithstanding, 2 Corinthians 8-9 form the most significant body of New Testament teaching on the subject of Christian giving. There are certainly normative principles embedded within the historical and personal material. Grace Giving vs. Faith PromiseAdvocates of “faith promise” missionary giving point to these chapters as the biblical basis for the system. Some go so far as to say that “faith promise” is the biblical system, not a human device that conforms (or can conform) to biblical principle. In my judgment, the latter position can lead to the exaltation of human tradition above divine command—all in the name of adherence to Scripture. It is significant to note that faith does not play a prominent part in passage under examination. The word itself occurs only once, and there by way of contrast with giving (8:7).1 On the other hand, the language of the text suggests that the overarching principle of giving taught here is grace. The Greek word charis (often translated “grace” but containing other shades of meaning, such as favor, thanks, and gift) occurs ten times in the space of two chapters. In the King James Version, it is translated “grace” seven times (8:1; 8:6; 8:7; 8:9; 8:19; 9:8; 9:14). The Purpose of Grace GivingThe collection referred to in 2 Corinthians 8-9 was designed
to meet the material needs of the poor Christians in Jerusalem.2
Within the passage Paul referred to it as “the ministering to the saints” (8:4;
9:1). A companion text in Paul’s earlier canonical letter to Corinth makes it
clear that the offering was going to Jerusalem (1 Cor. 16:1), a matter which is
confirmed by other Pauline references (Rom. 15:25-26; cf. Acts 11:27-30; Gal.
2:10). It was, in a nutshell, an effort to relieve the physical needs of
Christians under stress. The collection was missionary in the sense that it
addressed needs outside the context of the givers’ local congregation, but it
was not primarily evangelistic. Grace Giving: The Macedonians’ Example (8:1-5)Paul begins his discussion of grace giving by narrating the
experience of the Macedonian churches (v. 1). Macedonia was a Roman province that
contained such cities as Philippi, Thessalonica, and Berea (cf. Acts
16:5-17:14). It was situated north of Achaia (where Corinth was). The
Macedonians were, therefore, the Corinthians’ not-too-distant neighbors.
Severely impoverished, they begged Paul to accept a generous contribution
towards the Jerusalem collection (vv. 2-4). Their generosity stemmed from
spiritual commitment: They gave themselves to the Lord, then to Paul and his
companions, and subsequently to Paul’s vision for delivering an offering to
Jerusalem. Grace Giving: An Exhortation to Participate (8:6-15)Having described the Macedonians’ sacrificial giving, Paul proceeded to encourage the Corinthians to contribute to the project as well. The Corinthians were otherwise spiritually mature (v. 7). Paul challenged them with the Macedonian example and with their own experience of Christ’s grace (vv. 8-9). In addition, he reminded them of their earlier enthusiasm about giving: They had indicated their willingness to contribute a year before (vv. 10-12). Paul explained that the key issue was “a willing mind”; his
readers were accountable for the resources they had rather than those they
didn’t have (8:12). Thus he affirmed the matter of proportionate giving (cf. 1
Cor. 16:2). Furthermore, his plan was not about depleting their resources, but
about producing equality among Christians on a broad scale. The Corinthians’
present abundance would supply the Judeans’ need; if circumstances were
reversed in the future, the Corinthians would become beneficiaries. Paul
correlated this principle with the Israelites’ collection of manna in the
wilderness (cf. Exod. 16:18). Grace Giving: The Role of Spiritual Leaders (8:16-9:5)Paul had asked Titus to oversee the completion of the Corinthian gift (8:6). However, Titus took the initiative to do so, being burdened by God for this purpose (8:16-17). There were two unnamed brothers who were designated by the churches (probably those of Macedonia) to aid in the administration of the gift (8:18, 22; 9:3). Paul referred to Titus as his “partner and fellowhelper concerning you,” and to the brothers as “the messengers of the churches” (8:23). Why were so many people involved in the offering? The leaders played two roles in relation to the collection—promotion and administration. Paul, Titus, and the unnamed brothers were involved in motivating the Corinthians to give (9:1-5). Such giving did not take place overnight. A year had passed, and the collection was not yet complete. Promoting giving is a time-intensive process. The spiritual leaders were also concerned with maintaining
the integrity of the giving process. Paul had already stated to the Corinthians
that they would be able to select representatives to deliver their offering to
Jerusalem (1 Cor. 16:3-4). Now he was taking measures to ensure that no one
could accuse the leaders of handling the gift unethically (8:20-21). Church
finances are a delicate matter. Wherever money is given to God, it should be
administered with great care. Grace Giving: Material and Spiritual Outcomes (9:6-15)How, then, were the Corinthians to give, and what could they expect to happen when they did? Paul answered these questions in the final section of his offering discussion. It is here, more than elsewhere, that enduring principles of giving appear. As to how the gift was to be given, Paul spoke of three principles:
The Corinthians’ generosity would yield several outcomes:
Paul concluded his discussion of grace giving with a
doxology, thanking “God for his unspeakable gift” (9:15). This is most likely a
reference to God’s gift of salvation in the person of Christ (cf. 8:9). ConclusionThe story of Paul’s Jerusalem collection has much to say regarding support for Christian causes through the local church. God desires to supply the material needs of His work through the generosity of His people. The genius of grace giving is that we learn to become channels through which God delivers blessings to those in need. Through this process, we give beyond our ability—in a way that is unmistakably a work of grace. What can be said of the “faith promise” movement? The terminology itself is not found in Scripture; while not inherently anti-biblical, it probably should be abandoned in favor of biblical phraseology (i.e., grace giving). It is more difficult to evaluate the idea of “faith promise,” principally because it is practiced in many different ways in different churches. The “faith promise” approach does admit some possible abuses:
“Faith promise” need not be practiced abusively, however. If
presented as a means of giving according to biblical principle, and practiced
in accord with the normative principles of 2 Corinthians 8-9, it can be
God-honoring and singularly effective in rallying Christians to support
spiritual causes. BibliographyBrown, Keith, and John W. Hoover. Faith Promise and beyond: Unlocking the Resources of the Church to Help Fulfill the Great Commission. N.p.: Authors, 1995. Davis, James A. “1-2 Corinthians.” Baker Commentary on the Bible. Ed. Walter A. Elwell. Evangelical Commentary on the Bible. 1989. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2000. 958-97. DeHoog, John W. “Contribution.” The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. 4 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979-88. Harris, Murray J. “2 Corinthians.” The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, New Testament. Ed. Frank E. Gaebelein. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976-92. Zondervan NIV Study Bible Library. CD-ROM. Vers. 2.8. Zondervan, 2001. Lowery, David K. “2 Corinthians.” The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures by Dallas Seminary Faculty. Ed. John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck. New Testament ed. [Wheaton, IL]: Victor-Scripture Press, 1983. 551-86. Morley, Brian K.
“Tithe, Tithing.” Baker Theological
Dictionary of the Bible. Ed. Walter A. Elwell. Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology. 1996. Grand Rapids:
Baker, 2000. Woods, Damon, and Bob Hughes. Total Involvement: The Faith Promise Plan of
Missions. Philippines: Authors, 1968. Notes1 Of course, any form of Christian giving properly belongs to the realm of faith. Surrendering our possessions to God requires us to trust Him to meet our needs with less than what we would otherwise have. Nevertheless, faith plays no greater role in the kind of giving taught here than in any other form of Christian giving. 2 According
to Harris, “The offering was destined for the Hebrew Christians at Jerusalem,
who may have referred to themselves as ‘the poor’ (hoi ptochoi, Rom 15:26; Gal 2:10; = Heb. haebyonim, cf. Ebionites)—those who were completely dependent on
God's provision (cf. Matt 5:3). Several factors account for their continuing
poverty: (1) After their conversion to Christianity many Jews in Jerusalem
would have been ostracized socially and economically. (2) The ‘experiment in
community sharing’ described in Acts 2:44, 45 and 4:32, 34, 35 undoubtedly
would have aggravated, though it did not cause, their poverty. (3) Persistent
food shortages in Palestine because of overpopulation culminated in the famine
of A.D. 46 in the time of Emperor Claudius (Acts 11:27-30). (4) As the
mother-church of Christendom, the Jerusalem church was obliged to support a
proportionately large number of teachers and probably to provide hospitality
for frequent Christian visitors to the holy city. (5) Jews in Palestine were
subject to a crippling twofold taxation—Jewish and Roman.” Download This Resource |
Textual Studies >