Lesson ▪ 2000 Tags: 1 Chronicles; 2 Chronicles; Israel In the Chronicles we find an overview of the history of Israel from the nation’s inception through the Babylonian captivity, emphasizing primarily the period of the monarchy. As we approach these books, we must obviously ask why God saw fit to reiterate in them much of the history narrated in Samuel and Kings. The answer to this question will be discussed following a few introductory facts. Facts about the ChroniclesMeaning of the NameThe Chronicles apparently owe their name to Jerome, a fourth-century theologian. He “suggested that a more representative title . . . would be Chronicon totius divinae historiae or ‘a chronicle of the whole of sacred history.’ . . . Modern versions in English and other languages have adopted the title ‘Chronicles’ that Jerome proposed.”1 The term chronicle literally means a “detailed historical account of events arranged in order of time without analysis or interpretation.” The Unity of the Book(s)The books of the Chronicles form a cohesive unit. They are
truly a single book that was divided into two early in the history of Bible
translation.2 The
thematic unity of the books will be discussed later in this outline. AuthorshipMost conservative writers believe 1 and 2 Chronicles were composed approximately 400 BC. Some, such as Gleason Archer, suggest that Ezra authored the books: “It is quite possible that the Talmudic tradition (Baba Bathra, 15a) is correct in assigning the authorship to Ezra. As the chief architect of the spiritual and moral revival of the Second Commonwealth, he would have had every incentive to produce a historical survey of this sort.”3 However, there is by no means agreement among biblical scholars on this point. R. K. Harrison represents the opposite view: “The present writer . . . would assign the composition of Chronicles to an anonymous writer in the closing decades of the fifth century B.C. or slightly later. Attempts to identify the Chronicler with Ezra appear inadvisable. . . .”4 Sources of InformationThe Chronicler availed himself of numerous sources of historical information, including both biblical books (particularly Samuel and the Kings) and extra-biblical sources. The Chronicler often alluded to these sources when concluding the description of a given king’s reign. A sample of such sources includes the following:
Regardless of the human sources that may have been available to the Chronicler, we recognize that God superintended the composition process, ensuring its accuracy. Focus of the ChroniclesThe Chronicles differ from the other Old Testament historical books in their historical perspective, as explained in the following quote: The Chronicler is not a historian in the strict Western sense. To him Israel’s history was pregnant with spiritual and moral lessons. . . . He is not concerned so much with the bare facts of Israel’s history as with their meaning. If all valid historical writing is interpretative, the Chronicler’s is highly interpretative.5 The following chart contrasts the emphases of the Chronicles
as compared to Samuel and Kings:6
Lessons from the ChroniclesChronicles highlights the importance of maintaining a straight spiritual course, both individually and corporately. At least three major lessons emerge from its pages:
Notes1 R. K. Harrison, Introduction to the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1969), 1152.2 Ibid. 3 Gleason L. Archer, A Survey of Old Testament Introduction, rev. ed. (Chicago: Moody Press, 1994), 450. 4 R. K. Harrison, Introduction to the Old Testament, 1157. 5 William Sanford LaSor, David Allan Hubbard, and Frederic William Bush, Old Testament Survey: The Message, Form, and Background of the Old Testament, 2d ed. (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1996), 543. 6 The information in this chart is gathered from the author’s reading of the Scripture as well as a variety of secondary sources: Paul N. Benware, Survey of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody Press, 1988), 123; Norman L. Geisler, A Popular Survey of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1977), 147, 156-157; Eugene H. Merrill, “1 Chronicles,” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, edited by John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck (Colorado Springs: ChariotVictor Publishing, 1985), 590-591. 7 “Though there are sporadic references to Israel, the Northern Kingdom, the whole thrust of 2 Chronicles 11-36 is centered in the Southern Kingdom. The history of the divided kingdom is always viewed in that light. David and the Davidic descent is the great theme” (Eugene H. Merrill, “1 Chronicles,” 590). 8 The Chronicler’s “purpose is to show that the true glory of the Hebrew nation was found in its covenant relationship to God, as safeguarded by the prescribed forms of worship in the temple and administered by the divinely ordained priesthood and the divinely authorized dynasty of David. Always the emphasis is upon that which is sound and valid in Israel’s past, as furnishing a reliable basis for the task of national reconstruction which lay before them” (Gleason L. Archer, A Survey of Old Testament Introduction, 449). 9 See the accompanying chart for data concerning the emphasis of Chronicles on the priests. 10 “Chronicles was written . . . from a religious point of view, while Kings was compiled . . . from a prophetic perspective. . . . Chronicles stresses more strongly the divine activity in national events as well as their religious implications” (Norman L. Geisler, A Popular Survey of the Old Testament, 156-157). 11 “The chronicler’s emphasis on David, the priesthood, and the temple would have been a source of great encouragement to postexilic Judah. The nation had fallen into captivity, a comparatively small remnant had returned, and the restored temple was meager compared with its former splendor. . . . But God’s promises will not fail. In His time the temple will be filled with His own glory. And the Davidic line once more will be established and the Messiah will rule on David’s throne in the kingdom” (Eugene H. Merrill, “1 Chronicles,” 591). Download This Resource |
Introductory Studies >